
Jennifer’s blog posts continuously challenge viewers’ notions concerning the scriptive nature of individuals, the spaces they inhabit, and the things they encounter. Consider - did the comfy chair at Barnes and Noble script Jennifer’s experience at the store, enabling a complete reading of Kafka’s Metamorphoses, thus making unnecessary actual purchase of the book? Or did Jennifer’s preference for reading while in a cozy seat script this non-monetary involvement with the major merchant? Viewers come away from the blog with an understanding that a surrounding environment can influence participation with a ‘spectacle’ (to borrow from Debord), but also that individuals have power to change or affect personal interaction with nearby settings: neither subject nor surroundings can completely control a situation. [However, I am currently inclined to blame Jennifer for the disappearance of the comfy chairs from my bookstore…but I digress.]
Finally, Jennifer’s blog posts point to the practice of scholarship: ultimately a scholar is challenged to create a scriptive thing for an academic audience and that audience has the power to interact with the scriptive thing in the manner it sees fit. Currently, scholarship strives for multidisciplinarity while maintaining due respect for the various fields implicated by such work. While striving for multidisciplinarity, scholars are also challenged with carving out recognized places (homes) within institutions for their academic work – creating a field (“firm ground on which to hold our ideas”) while maintaining ties to multiple disciplines (diligently using “portable concepts/words/terms/ideas”) (http://juszkiewicz.wordpress.com/2012/09/27/charles-bazerman-the-problem-of-writing-knowledge/). Scholars must find the work within which their comfort lies, but their work must have a comfy home in which to be produced. Perhaps our blogs and our involvement in this class are steps in that direction. [Too saccharine? Perhaps that’s appropriate for a metapost...]
No comments:
Post a Comment