I was interested in Iris’s and
Cody’s blog posts for these readings, especially in relation to the Auslander
reading. The three-part structure that Auslander lays out and that Iris probed—person,
persona, and character—seems very relevant to Cody’s discussion of the problems
that he had with the authenticity of the performances of queerness. The
positioning of the person, the “real” David Jones (David Bowie) or the “real”
Marc Feld (Marc Bolan), seems to be the problem here, and the fact that the go
under assumed names is significant. What Cody’s post makes clear is the way
that the real person is radically divorced from the persona in the case of the
glam rock performer, I would argue especially in these cases of celebrity, and
the way that this division has been historically ignored in the cases of those
participants in drag subcultures. It seems to me that the reason that David
Bowie or Marc Bolan would have not been under the same kind of physical threat
as those who performed drag or queer identities in other spaces also has
something to do with our cultural willingness to separate a performance
identity from a personal identity. Thus, the “bodily risks” that Cody speaks of
were prevented by both literal policing forces (bodyguards, crowd control) and
a cultural policing of identity layering. It seems that the violence erupted in
the cases of “everyday queer subjects and drag performers” because of an
inability to see these people as performers of identity. The person and the
persona are read as one in the same, and if these did not conform to standards
of identity, violence ensued. Identity distance seems as important here as physical distance.
No comments:
Post a Comment