There were two types of dance performances at the Gala last
Sunday—those that were based in a narrative and those that were not (or were
less so). Throughout our discussions about dance, I've been thinking about the
role that narrative plays in my understanding and appreciation of art, and
whether meaning can exist without it. I’d like to use those questions to frame
my review of the Gala, in which Rite of Summer and Straight Duet relied on some
kind of direct narrative and Esplanade and Nascimento Novo did not.
The program notes for Rite of Summer tell us that the dance
is playing with references to the ballets Rite of Spring and Giselle. Even
without these notes, though, I read the dance as a narrative because of the
props, costumes, and interactions between dancers. The twitching movements of
the dancers and their facial expressions indicated a struggle between opposing forces. Much
of the pleasure or enjoyment of watching was about puzzling out the story and
the characters. The narrative in Straight Duet was much more obvious, and the
pleasure in the dance came more from seeing impressive athletic feats and
simultaneously seeing the parts of the story that they conveyed.
In the non-narrative dances, I noticed myself responding
more physically to the performance. Through most of Esplanade and Nascimento,
my enjoyment came from the physicality of the dancers as they moved and the joy
that they seemed to have in their own movement. They were often smiling as they
ran or jumped or spun onstage, and I felt my face become more lifted as
well, raising my eyebrows and lips slightly. I kept finding that my leg
muscles, especially my calves, were slightly flexed as I watched, and when the
music had a strong beat, I tapped my toes in my shoes. At their best moments,
these dances conveyed a kind of exuberance in movement that I somehow
experienced with them. I’m not sure that I can completely remove narrative from
my understanding and appreciation of dance, but the chief enjoyment I took from
Esplanade and Nascimento came from a different, more obscure, source.
No comments:
Post a Comment