There seem to be several competing questions on Dorothy’s
blog: How have black Americans been represented or performed by others? How
have black Americans represented or performed themselves? And how do these
representations and performances relate to questions of black “realness” and
authenticity? This seems to be related back, although in a much more nuanced
way, to Auslander’s distinctions between person, persona, and character. The
levels of identity in the performance of race seem, in many of these
representations to peel back in layers from the inauthentic to the ever and
ever more authentic. Yet, in the course of Dorothy’s blog this model of black
authenticity (as a construction or performance) is problem occuring on the
level of representation.
How does Dorothy’s blog do this? One of the most powerful
elements of Dorothy’s blog is her juxtaposition of photographic and cartoon
representations of black faces and bodies. These images are scriptive in their
own claims to realness. The caricatures represented in images like
A
Black Woman,
Anton Kannemeyer, 2010 (http://broadwayindahomey.tumblr.com/post/29999001579/blackcontemporaryart-a-black-woman-anton),
and Swing Wedding (MGM, 1937, 7 min) Directed by Hugh Harman, Rudolf Ising (http://broadwayindahomey.tumblr.com/post/30000511527/swing-wedding-mgm-1937-7-min-directed-by-hugh)
invite a reconsideration of the seemingly more truthful medium of photography.
By juxtaposing these types of cartoons with photographs and “life-like”
drawings such as Two Scenes from “In
Dahomey” (http://broadwayindahomey.tumblr.com/post/29999530756),
and Bert Williams and George Walker (http://broadwayindahomey.tumblr.com/post/29919830493/when-bert-williams-and-george-walker-first-began
and http://broadwayindahomey.tumblr.com/post/29968173062/from-an-article-on-williams-and-walker-in-the)
Dorothy scripts her audience’s reading of the authenticity of the photographic
medium. Dorothy’s blog is a visual narrative of Laura Wexler’s point in Female Subjects in Black and White that “photography
was part of the mater narrative that created and cemented cultural and political
inequalities of race and class” (164). Questions of realness function
both on the level of the black individual and on the level of the medium of
representation. Or rather, what we are meant to see, perhaps, is the way that
these two levels are inextricable, that
questions of identity are questions of representation. These scriptive images document
performances of race, yet, hopefully, they also allow for a reconsideration of
the realness of the images themselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment